<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Subaru News and Notes</title>
	<subtitle>Quick hit news stories about recalls, lawsuits, and TSBs.</subtitle>
	<link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/feed.xml" rel="self"/>
	<link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/"/>
	<updated>2021-04-26T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
	<id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/</id>
	<author>
    <name>Scott McCracken</name>
    <email>scott@carcomplaints.com</email>
	</author>
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru Recalls Loose Stabilizer Brackets in 448,000 Vehicles</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2021/stabilizer-bracket-recall/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2021/stabilizer-bracket-recall/</id>
      <published>2021-04-26T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2021-04-26T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru is recalling 448,000 vehicles to <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2021/subaru-recalls-crosstrek-crosstrek-hybrid-forester.shtml">stop the rear stabilizer brackets from coming loose</a>.</strong> Inconsistent bracket dimensions resulted in <strike>easily predicatable</strike> &quot;larger than anticipated&quot; gaps between the bracket and the frame.<!--more--></p>
<p>The gap allows vibrations from driving to loosen the bolts—especially if they weren't, as Subaru now belives, properly torqued during manufacturing—allowing the stabilizer bracket to shift or disconnect. And that's a problem unless you want your car to feel like you're driving a boat on rolling seas.</p>
<h2 id="about-the-stabilizer-recall">About the Stabilizer Recall <a class="heading-permalink" href="#about-the-stabilizer-recall">∞</a></h2>
<ul>
<li>The issue affects the 2018-2019 Crosstrek, 2019 Crosstrek Hybrid, and 2019 Forester.</li>
<li>The automaker says the only warning sign would be an abnormal rattling noise from the rear of the vehicle.</li>
<li>Owners can expect the recall (<a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2021/subaru-recalls-crosstrek-crosstrek-hybrid-forester.shtml">#WRD-21</a>) to start on May 14th, 2021.</li>
</ul>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Single Factory Worker Linked to Latest Transmission Recall for 2021 Impreza and Outback</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2021/gear-shifter-nut-recall/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2021/gear-shifter-nut-recall/</id>
      <published>2021-02-02T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2021-02-02T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru isn't pulling any punches when placing blame for their latest recall.</strong> They say &quot;a single associate&quot; was found using &quot;an improper torque wrench technique&quot; while tightening a cable nut in the CVT select lever of the 2021 Impreza and Outback. That's going to be an awkward next performance review. If left loose, the gear selector may not function properly.<!--more--></p>
<h3 id="about-the-recall">About the Recall <a class="heading-permalink" href="#about-the-recall">∞</a></h3>
<ul>
<li>This is both a recall <em>and</em> stop-sale of any unsold vehicles, totalling 383 in the US.</li>
<li>The affected Outbacks were built between 12/14/2020 and 12/21/2020, while the Imprezas were built between 12/14/2020 and 12/18/2020.</li>
<li>The recall (#WRA-21) is expected to begin on 02/19/2021.</li>
</ul>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru Windshield Lawsuit Survives Motion to Dismiss</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2021/windshield-lawsuit-partially-dismissed/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2021/windshield-lawsuit-partially-dismissed/</id>
      <published>2021-01-06T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2021-01-06T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>The lawsuit against Subaru's crappy windshields will move forward after partially surviving the automaker's motion to dismiss.</strong> The windhsields crack and chip at an alarming rate, but Subaru doesn't cover replacements under warranty if the issue is due to a defect. According to them the warranty only covers material or workmanship issues. Strange position to take, but ok.</p>
<p>While a few allegations were removed due to legal technacilities, the judge said dismissing the case entirely at this point would be premature.<!--more--></p>
<h2 id="about-the-case">About the case <a class="heading-permalink" href="#about-the-case">∞</a></h2>
<ul>
<li>The case, <em><a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2020/subaru-windshield-lawsuit-partly-dismissed.shtml">Powell, et al., v. Subaru of America, Inc.</a></em> is a consolidation of multiple class-actions filed between October 2019 and April 2020.</li>
<li>Five of the breach of express warranty claims were dismissed because the plaintiffs didn't present their vehicles to Subaru for repairs, although all indications are they would have been turned away anyway.</li>
<li>For the surviving arguments the plaintiffs may need to ammend their allegations. If the problem is found to be a &quot;defective design&quot;, as suggested, it sounds like the judge will side with Subaru. We'll see.</li>
</ul>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru Continues to Ignore Unintended Acceleration Complaints, Leading to a Second Lawsuit</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/second-unintended-acceleration-lawsuit/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/second-unintended-acceleration-lawsuit/</id>
      <published>2020-09-09T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2020-09-09T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru owners say their vehicles are surging forward when trying to shift into PARK, even with a foot firmly on the brake pedal.</strong> The automaker continues to blame drivers for the incidents, propmting a second class-action lawsuit to be filed in a matter of months.<!--more--></p>
<p>The California lawsuit's plaintiffs have made very similar allegations to <a href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/unintended-acceleration-lawsuit/">the previous lawsuit filed in May</a>. Mostly that the vehicles <q cite="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2020/subaru-acceleration-lawsuit-forester-legacy-outback.shtml">will suddenly go into gear and lunge forward for a couple of seconds</q> despite having their foot on the brakes. Something allegedly caused by a disturbance in the electrical current of the throttle body.</p>
<p>Subaru doesn't appear concerned about the growing number of reports and hasn't issued a technical service bulletin about the problem.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Quebec Joins the Lawsuit Party Against DENSO</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/denso-quebec-lawsuit/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/denso-quebec-lawsuit/</id>
      <published>2020-08-05T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2020-08-05T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>A couple months back a proposed class-action lawsuit asked for additional protections for all Canadian citizens with defective Denso fuel pumps in their vehicles.</strong> Well, almost all citizens.<!--more--></p>
<p>The class-members inclused all qualifying owners or lessees in every province except Quebec. Now a new lawsuit wants the same protections for Quebec citizens.</p>
<p>Both lawsuits are worried that even with recalls available, not everyone is convered and those that are haven't been told to stop driving until the repairs have been made.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>What About the Rest Of Us? Lawsuit Wonder Why Subaru&#39;s Fuel Pump Recall Skipped Over 188,000 Owners</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/fuel-pump-recall-lawsuit/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/fuel-pump-recall-lawsuit/</id>
      <published>2020-07-30T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2020-07-30T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru did the right thing by recalling over 200,000 vehicles</strong> that are at risk of stalling out because of a defect in their <em>Denso</em> fuel pumps. But did they skip over another 188,000 vehicles with the same risks?<!--more--></p>
<p>While the recall only covered certain 2019 models built between January and April of 2018, a new class-action lawsuit says the pumps can be found in vehicles dating all the way back to 2013. It also wonders why certain 2019 models, like the Forester, were skipped.</p>
<p>&quot;<em>Rather than spend the money ... to address the defect, or at least warn its customers that they have cars equipped with faulty fuel pumps,</em>&quot; the suit reads, &quot;<em>Subaru has shifted the significant and serious risk of inoperable vehicles, accidents, injury, and even death onto its customers.</em>&quot;</p>
<p>The lead plaintiff says any Denso fuel pumps with a part number prefix of 42022 should be recalled.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Conspiracy About Subaru&#39;s &#39;Secret Software Update&#39; to Turbocharged Engines Gets Mostly Dismissed in Court</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/xt-engine-lawsuit-dropped/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/xt-engine-lawsuit-dropped/</id>
      <published>2020-07-28T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2020-07-28T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Cheryl Sauer says her 2014 Forester XT was never the same after it came back from a 2016 emissions recall.</strong> The engine would surge and stall. So naturally, Subaru must have installed some secret software under the guise of an emissions fix to de-tune the engine in an effort to address a long-running ignition timing issue.</p>
<p><em>Naturally.</em><!--more--></p>
<p>There's no real evidence that any of this actually happened. But part of me really wants it to be true just so I can envision a meeting leader at Subaru HQ pulling down the blinds to the board room before saying &quot;ok, everyone ... I've got this idea.&quot;</p>
<p>Sauer <a href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2018/subaru-secret-software-update-lawsuit/">sued Subaru</a> demanding they pay for new engines because the surging issues can descrease the value of the vehicle. She included the 2014-2016 Subaru XT and 2015-2016 Subaru WRX in her arguments.</p>
<p>But in their motion to dismiss Subaru points out that not all those vehicles were included in the 2016 recall. Not only that, but the Forester uses an FA-series engine, while the WRX uses an EJ-series – two different engine platforms that don't share interchangable parts.</p>
<p>That was enough to get a New Jersey judge to drop the case for any vehicle except for the 2014 Foreter XT with the 2.0-liter turbocharged engine.</p>
<p>So you're saying there's a chance.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>A Settlement for Certain Starlink Repairs Has Been Approved</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/starlink-lawsuit-approval/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/starlink-lawsuit-approval/</id>
      <published>2020-07-17T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2020-07-17T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru has approved a Starlink lawsuit settlement even after denying their infotainment system is full of defects.</strong> Stuff like the backup camera freezing, the radio failing, and the screen going blank.<!--more--></p>
<p>The <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2019/subaru-starlink-class-action-lawsuit-preliminarily-approved.shtml">settlement</a> provides an extended warranty on the system up to five years or 100,000 miles.</p>
<p>Certain out-of-pocket expenses may also be covered.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Canadian Lawsuit Wants More Transparency with the Denso Fuel Pump Recall</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/denso-canada-lawsuit/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/denso-canada-lawsuit/</id>
      <published>2020-06-08T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2020-06-08T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Last month Denso announced that nearly 2 million of its low-pressure fuel pumps will need to be recalled before they cause the engine to stall.</strong> The recall will replace the pumps in certain vehicles but a new Canadian lawsuit says that doesn't go far enough.<!--more--></p>
<ol>
<li>Failure of the low-pressure pumps cause further problems &quot;downstream&quot; that also cost money to repair and diminish the resale value of the vehicle.</li>
<li>The recalls don't go far enough to warn drivers that they should stop driving their vehicles until they are fixed.</li>
</ol>
<p>The lawsuit references <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2020/denso-fuel-pump-recall-impellers.shtml">recalls in the US</a> and covers class-members in all Candian provinces except, oddly, Quebec (<em>tant pis pour toi!</em>).</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Owners File a Class-Action Lawsuit Over Subaru&#39;s Unintended Acceleration Problems</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/unintended-acceleration-lawsuit/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/unintended-acceleration-lawsuit/</id>
      <published>2020-05-18T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2020-05-18T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru vehicles are accelerating on their own and the automaker's claim that owners are to blame isn't going over well.</strong> A new class-action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of owners with cars that may have unintended acceleration problems. This includes the 2012-2018 Forester, 2015-2019 Legacy, and 2015-2019 Outback.</p>
<p>One of the lead plaintiffs says they were driving slowly with the foot on the brake pedal, and as they were about to shift into PARK the vehicle surged forward causing a collision.<!--more--></p>
<p>The lawsuit alleges that Subaru has concealed the problem since 2011 and that dealerships routinely blame the drivers for mixing up the pedals or letting their floor mats get out of place.</p>
<p>It's the <a href="http://toyotaproblems.com/unintended-acceleration/">same thing Toyota used to say</a> before they had to recall over 4 million vehicles for similar problems.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Over 200,000 Subaru Vehicles Recalled Because their Denso Fuel Pumps Are Failing</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/denso-fuel-pump-recall/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/denso-fuel-pump-recall/</id>
      <published>2020-04-23T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2020-04-23T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>A group of 2019 models equipped with <em>Denso</em> low-pressure fuel pumps have been recalled after multiple reports of the engine stalling out.</strong> The impellers inside the pumps may have been excessively exposed to a drying agent during manufacturing.<!--more--></p>
<p>The drying agent can cause micro-cracks that absorb fuel and expand over time leading to swelling and deformities.</p>
<p>Once the impeller can't properly rotate inside the pump, fuel stops going to the engine, and bad things start to happen.</p>
<p>At least 245 fuel pump warranty claims have been filed.</p>
<p>The recalled vehicles include any 2019 Ascent, Impreza, Legacy, and Outback manufactured between April and July of 2018.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>2019 Crosstreks Recalled to Replace Rear Seat Belt Assemblies</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/crosstrek-seatbelt-recall/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/crosstrek-seatbelt-recall/</id>
      <published>2020-04-07T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2020-04-07T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru says the rear seat belt assemblies in the 2019 Crosstrek aren't going to properly protect people in a crash.</strong> They believe the pawl springs were improperly installed in about 5,500 vehicles.<!--more--></p>
<p>The faulty pawl springs can cause the webbing sensor locks to fail. Which is a fancy way of saying buckling up isn't going to do much good in a crash.</p>
<p>Back in January Subaru announced a similar recall in other countries where dual-mode locking mechanisms are a requirement. For whatever reason it took them a couple months to decide to offer the same recall repair to owners in the USA and Canada.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru Wants Windshield Lawsuit Dropped</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/motion-dismiss-windshield-lawsuit/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/motion-dismiss-windshield-lawsuit/</id>
      <published>2020-03-15T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2020-03-15T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>&quot;Our windshields may crack, but we didn't break federal safety standard #205&quot;</strong> appears to be Subaru's defense in court against a class-action cracked windshield lawsuit.<!--more--></p>
<p>The motion to dismiss says the plaintiffs' argument lacks standing because the <em>breadth of vehicles included</em> consists of <em>two different design generations</em> where Subaru used multiple windshield suppliers.</p>
<p>So ... maybe they both suck?</p>
<p>Subaru's warranty does exclude coverage for &quot;<em>any part which malfunctions, fails or is damaged due to objects striking the vehicle, road hazards</em>&quot; but not spontaneous malfunctions like many owners have complained about.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Investigation into Forester&#39;s Passenger Airbag Problems Has Closed Following Recall</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/forester-passenger-airbag-investigation-closed/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2020/forester-passenger-airbag-investigation-closed/</id>
      <published>2020-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2020-02-01T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>An investigation looking into OCS airbag-related problems in Subaru's 4th generation Forester has been closed following a recall.</strong> In the 2015-2018 model years, the passenger airbag would remain disabled even if a passenger was sitting in the seat.<!--more--></p>
<p>During the investigation it was determined that a decrease in contact pressure between the terminals of the OCS sensor mat was causing an unstable electrical connection. This is likely limited to those vehicles with heated seats.</p>
<p>NHTSA is satisfied that Subaru's <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2019/subaru-forester-passenger-airbag-sensor-recall.shtml">recall of 366,000+</a> Forester has solved the problem, and has closed their investigation.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Another Lawsuits Looks to Expand on Previous Cracked Windshield Suit</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2019/another-cracked-windshield-lawsuit/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2019/another-cracked-windshield-lawsuit/</id>
      <published>2019-12-27T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2019-12-27T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Just a month after Powell v. Subaru, a second lawsuit is accusing the automaker of selling cars with defective windshields.</strong> The plaintiffs say the use of &quot;acoustic glass&quot; in the windshields seems to correspond with the uptick in complaints.<!--more--></p>
<p>This case adds additional models to class-action pool, including the Outback, Forester, Crosstrek, Impreza, Legacy, and Ascent.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Lawsuit Says Forester and Outbacks Have Windshields That Crack Spontaneously</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2019/cracked-windshield-class-action/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2019/cracked-windshield-class-action/</id>
      <published>2019-11-03T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2019-11-03T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>The lawsuit says Subaru refuses to pay for repairs under warranty even though the cracks are not being caused by an external force, but some internal defect.</strong> Additionally, the cost to replace the windshield skyrockets because the <em><a href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/eyesight/">EyeSight</a></em> system needs to be recalibrated each time.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>The Feds Wants to Know Why the Forester Keeps Turning Off the Passenger Airbags</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2019/forester-ocs-investigation/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2019/forester-ocs-investigation/</id>
      <published>2019-08-11T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2019-08-11T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Some 4th generation Forester owners say the passenger airbags will stay off, even when there's a passenger in the seat.</strong> This is likely a sensor issue in the vehicle's capacitive occupant classification system (OCS).<!--more--></p>
<p>The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) says they've received 51 complaints about this issue and plan on investigating the 2016-2018 model years specifically, covering about 554,000 vehicles.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>The Latest 783,000 Subaru Vehicles Recalled with Takata Inflators</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2019/another-takata-recall/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2019/another-takata-recall/</id>
      <published>2019-02-28T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2019-02-28T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru is recalling 783,000 vehicles to replace dangerous Takata airbag inflators.</strong> This campaign is part of an industry-wide effort involving more than a dozen automakers and 1.7 million vehicles. The chemical inside of Takata airbag inflators can become unstable over time, leading to violent and sometimes deadly airbag deployments. <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2019/subaru-recalls-783000-vehicles-for-takata-airbags.shtml">The recall is for both driver and passenger side inflators in certain 2010-2014 model years, but is limited to certain states.</a></p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>WRX Piston Detonation Lawsuit Seeks Class-Action Certification</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2019/wrx-piston-detonation-lawsuit/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2019/wrx-piston-detonation-lawsuit/</id>
      <published>2019-01-28T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2019-01-28T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>A lawsuit says that the Subaru <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2018/subaru-wrx-ringland-failure-lawsuit.shtml">WRX suffers from sudden engine failure due to piston detonation</a></strong>, a well-known cause of damage to the piston and piston ringlands. The <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2018/subaru-wrx-ringland-failure-lawsuit.shtml">proposed class-action</a> includes all current and former owners or lessees of the 2009-2018 Subaru Impreza WRX and WRX STI.<!--more--></p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>Subaru allegedly knew WRX and WRX STI components were defective in engines coded EJ255, EJ257 and FA20. The plaintiffs say engines should last at least 120,000 miles but the Subaru engines may last just half that time before they fail.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2018/subaru-wrx-ringland-failure-lawsuit.shtml">Get the full details</a> on <a href="http://carcomplaints.com/">CarComplaints.com</a>.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru Sued After Multiple STARLINK Updates Have Failed to Make System Usable</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2018/starlink-software-update-lawsuit/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2018/starlink-software-update-lawsuit/</id>
      <published>2018-12-29T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2018-12-29T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>A lawsuit filed in New Jersey is tired of waiting around for software updates to Subaru’s STARLINK system to solve any of the wide ranging problems owners are experiencing.</strong> <q cite="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2018/subaru-starlink-lawsuit-update-failed.shtml">Subaru customers also complain about turning off the engines with the Starlink screens frozen, resulting in drained batteries that strand drivers. In addition, there is a clear and present safety issue if a driver relies on a frozen backup camera screen believing the image is in real time.</q><!--more--></p>
<p>Subaru has issued two software updates in the last year, but whether or not they actually improve anything is up in the air. The <a href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/starlink/">infotainment system</a> is notorious for freezing randomly, blasting the radio volume upon waking up, and generally being unresponsive.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Did Subaru Use an Emissions Recall to Secretly Install Engine Software?</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2018/subaru-secret-software-update-lawsuit/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2018/subaru-secret-software-update-lawsuit/</id>
      <published>2018-10-14T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2018-10-14T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>A new lawsuit accuses Subaru of using a 2016 emissions recall as a cover to secretly update engine software meant to prevent surging and stalling issues.</strong> If true, that’s both devious and cunning because <em>”by calling it an official emissions recall, an owner wouldn't be able to renew their vehicle registration until the recall work was complete.”</em></p>
<p><mark>The lawsuit only names 2014-2016 vehicles with turbocharged engines</mark>, including the Forester XT, WRX and WRX STI.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru Recalls Electronic Parking Brake That Might Not Engage</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2018/electronic-parking-brake-recall/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2018/electronic-parking-brake-recall/</id>
      <published>2018-10-05T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2018-10-05T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru is recalling 27,000 model year 2010-2014 Legacy and Outback vehicles because the electronic parking brake might not engage. All the recalled cars have manual transmissions.</strong> The automaker found a capacitor on the circuit board and/or the actuator stroke sensor magnetic ring located in the control unit of electronic parking brake may crack over time.</p>
<p>Anyone else remember when parking brakes weren’t fancy and just worked? Those were good times.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>New Year, New Takata Recalls. Because, Of Course There Is.</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2018/first-takata-recall-new-year/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2018/first-takata-recall-new-year/</id>
      <published>2018-01-20T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2018-01-20T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Whoever had January 20th in the <em>how long will it take for Subaru to have its first Takata recall in 2018</em> pool, step forward to claim your prize.</strong> The automaker is <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2018/subaru-recalls-tribeca-impreza-wrx-forester-legacy-outback.shtml">recalling 230,000 vehicles</a> to replace their passenger-side airbag inflators.<!--more--></p>
<p>The models include most of Subaru’s lineup – Forester, Legacy, Impreza, Outback, Tribeca, WRX. David Woods has the <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2018/subaru-recalls-tribeca-impreza-wrx-forester-legacy-outback.shtml">breakdown of model years and recall zones</a> on <a href="http://carcomplaints.com/">CarComplaints.com</a>.</p>
<p>Takata has been in the news a lot lately, and none of it has been good – more <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2018/takata-airbag-claims-another-life-florida.shtml">confirmed casualties</a> and <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2018/takata-recall-stop-driving-2006-ford-ranger.shtml">stop-driving orders</a> have prompted questions from our much-maligned <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2018/ford-ranger-driver-deaths-from-airbags.shtml">Senators</a>. Ooo, I have a question – <em>what the heck took them so long?</em></p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Does the WRX Have a High Performance Engine Without High Performance Protection?</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2017/wrx-high-performance-engine-lawsuit/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2017/wrx-high-performance-engine-lawsuit/</id>
      <published>2017-12-22T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2017-12-22T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>A class-action lawsuit alleges that Subaru’s high-performance engines, found in WRX and WRX STI vehicles, can’t create enough lubrication to properly protect the engines from failing.</strong> <q cite="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-wrx-engine-problems-class-action-lawsuit.shtml">_…the engines allegedly have severe problems with oil lubrication to the bearings and crankshafts which doesn't create enough lubrication to properly protect the engines from problems.</q><!--more--></p>
<p>This isn’t the first time we’ve heard about Subaru and <a href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/oil-consumption/">oil controversy</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>The plaintiff claims his 2010 Impreza WRX suffered complete engine failure in 2016 when the car had 73,000 miles on the odometer, something that shouldn't occur to an engine that should last for at least 120,000 miles.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Subaru was hit with a <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-wrx-engine-knock-spun-bearing-lawsuit.shtml">similar class-action</a> claiming the 2013-14 WRX and WRX STI are manufactured with defective “EJ” short block engines with insufficient oil supply to the bearings.</p>
<p>I’m sensing a trend.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru Extends Their CVT Warranty, but it’s a Limited Time Offer</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-cvt-warranty-extension/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-cvt-warranty-extension/</id>
      <published>2017-11-29T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2017-11-29T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>After some prodding, Subaru has decided to extend the warranty on their Lineartronic CVT.</strong> <q cite="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-transmission-warranty-extension.shtml">A Subaru transmission warranty extension has been issued for 2010-2015 Legacy and Outback, 2012-2015 Impreza, 2013-2015 Crosstrek, 2014-2015 Crosstrek Hybrid, 2014-2015 Forester and 2015 WRX vehicles, all equipped with continuously variable transmissions (CVTs).</q></p>
<p>However, it’s a limited time offer. <mark>Inspections or repairs need to be completed by July 31, 2018.</mark></p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Soy Vey! Hawaiian Lawsuit Says Subaru’s Soy-Based Wire Coatings Are Getting Chewed Up</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-soy-wiring-lawsuit-hawaii/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-soy-wiring-lawsuit-hawaii/</id>
      <published>2017-11-28T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2017-11-28T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru has been sued over its use of a soy-based wire coating, which one owner claims is attracting rodents and leading to thousands of dollars in damage.</strong> <q cite="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-soy-based-wiring-lawsuit.shtml">Plaintiff Joy Diane Shuey says she purchased a new 2015 Subaru Forester, but about a month later she took the SUV back to the dealer because of a fuel odor and an illuminated check engine light.</q><!--more--></p>
<p>The technician allegedly discovered the fuel line and rear wiper hose needed to be replaced because they had been chewed by rats. Shuey says she paid $318.52 for repairs that Subaru didn't cover under warranty.</p>
<p>This is by no means a Subaru-specific problem. To date, <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/lawsuit-rabbits-chew-honda-soy-wiring.shtml">Honda</a>, <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/toyota-soy-based-wiring-lawsuit-rodents-chew-wiring.shtml">Toyota</a>, <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2017/hyundai-soy-based-wiring-lawsuit-rodents.shtml">Hyundai</a>, and <a href="https://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2017/kia-soy-based-wiring-chewed-rodents-lawsuit.shtml">Kia</a> are all facing similar lawsuits for using soy-based coating and refusing to cover repairs under warranty.</p>
<p>According to automakers, <a href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/soy-wiring/">it’s unfortunate but not a defect</a>.</p>
<p>That doesn’t sit well with owners like Shuey who also had to pay $388.09 for a damaged fuel line and a staggering $2,433.30 to replace an engine wiring harness – both of which had been chewed by rats.</p>
<p>The class-action, <em>Joy Diane Shuey, et. al, vs. Servco Subaru, Inc, et. al.</em>, is only for owners who purchased a Subaru from a specific dealership in Hawaii. However, depending on the outcome it could lay the groundwork for statewide or nationwide litigation.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Lack of Fuel Pressure Causes Stalling in the 2017 Impreza</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2017/impreza-lack-of-fuel-pressure-recall/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2017/impreza-lack-of-fuel-pressure-recall/</id>
      <published>2017-04-18T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2017-04-18T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Are winterized fuels to blame for the stalling engines in 2017 Imprezas? If you ask Subaru, that's what they'll tell you.</strong> According to the automaker, while the car is stopped or moving slowly the winterized fuel begins to vaporize in the lines under higher ambient temperatures.</p>
<p>When vapor builds up, the fuel pressure goes down which leads to <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-recalls-impreza-stalling-problems.shtml" title="Lack of Fuel Pressure Causes Stalling in the 2017 Impreza">rough idling, stalling, or even a problem starting the engine</a>.<!--more--></p>
<p>More than 33,000 Imprezas will be <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-recalls-impreza-stalling-problems.shtml" title="Lack of Fuel Pressure Causes Stalling in the 2017 Impreza">recalled</a> but Subaru doesn't know when.</p>
<p>It's been a rough couple weeks for the 2017 Impreza which was also recently recalled for memory issues causing blank or frozen rearview camera screens.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Legacy Recalled For Rear View Screens That Go Blank or Freeze Up</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2017/rear-camera-failure-impreza-recall/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2017/rear-camera-failure-impreza-recall/</id>
      <published>2017-03-12T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2017-03-12T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>The rear view camera systems in some 2017 Imprezas weren't installed with enough memory, causing the screens to go blank or freeze up.</strong> Subaru will <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-recalls-2017-impreza-rear-view-camera-screens-fail.shtml" title="Legacy Recalled for Blank Rear View Screens">recall more than 25,000 of the 2017 Imprezas</a> to fix the issue.</p>
<p>While both situations are frustrating, a frozen screen seems particularly dangerous – it might give you the impression that the area behind you is clear, when it really isn't.<!--more--></p>
<p>As always, it's good not to rely 100% on technology.</p>
<p>Don't forget the tried-and-true &quot;look over your shoulder&quot; method. I won't even judge you when you complain about how tight your neck is while doing it.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru Can’t Escape Another Takata Recall</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-takata-recall/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-takata-recall/</id>
      <published>2017-01-20T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2017-01-20T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru may want you to feel the freedom, but even they can't escape a Takata recall.</strong> By now I'm guessing you've heard about the dangers of Takata airbags, but let's go over a quick recap.<!--more--></p>
<ol>
<li>Over time, Takata's airbag inflators are susceptible to moisture.</li>
<li>When that moisture mixes with the airbag's propellant, the inflator becomes unstable. That means it can <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/resources/guides/takata/">explode during a deployment</a> and send shrapnel throughout the cabin.</li>
<li>The problem is responsible for <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/honda-civic-driver-killed-exploding-takata-airbag.shtml">11 deaths in the USA alone</a>.</li>
</ol>
<p>Subaru is <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-recalls-replace-takata-airbags.shtml" title="Subaru Can’t Escape Another Takata Recall">recalling 186,000 vehicles</a>, some of them for the second time. Find out if yours is <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2017/subaru-recalls-replace-takata-airbags.shtml" title="Subaru Can’t Escape Another Takata Recall">on the list</a> (make sure to scroll through all the different recall &quot;zones&quot;).</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Turbocharged Engines Recalled to Stop Overheating Pump</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/turbocharged-engine-recall/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/turbocharged-engine-recall/</id>
      <published>2016-10-28T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2016-10-28T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru is recalling some turbocharged vehicles from the 2007-2013 model years.</strong> Those engines have a secondary air injection pump that can overheat, melt, and catch fire.<!--more--></p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;<em>...the automaker received another report and this time the secondary air injection pump caught fire. Subaru wanted to investigate the part but a fire department had already taken it. But by May 2015, Subaru learned of another pump catching on fire, and this time the automaker was able to look at the pump and confirm the underlying problem.</em>&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Subaru says a check engine light will warn drivers. But an even better warning might be all the smoke coming out of your hood. And remember, where there's smoke ...</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Well, That&#39;s One Way to Thaw a Windshield</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/wiper-motor-fires/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/wiper-motor-fires/</id>
      <published>2016-10-22T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2016-10-22T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>This year's Farmer's Almanac predicts winter to be a long, cold slap in the face. Especially for those of us in the northern areas. My least favorite part of winter? Scraping the darn windshield.</strong> Luckily, Subaru unintentionally came up with a solution to that problem. Unfortunately, it's a massive safety risk and needs to be <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-recalls-vehicles-melting-windshield-wiper-motors.shtml" title="Melting Windshield Wiper Motor Recall">recalled</a> immediately.<!--more--></p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;<em>The 2010-2014 Legacy and Outback have windshield wiper motors with bottom covers that can become contaminated. Because of the contamination, components inside the bottom covers can interfere with each other, and if the wipers are obstructed by anything, the motors can overheat, melt, [and catch on fire].</em>&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>OK, so obviously Subaru didn't intend for this to happen. But I promise you, there will come a time this winter when you wish your wiper motors were shooting fireballs at the 3&quot; of ice that accumulated on your windshield.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>New Knee Guards Won’t Help You in a Crash</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/knee-guard-recall/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/knee-guard-recall/</id>
      <published>2016-10-21T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2016-10-21T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru is issuing a recall for some loose knee guards that are there to provide additional protection for drivers wearing their seat belts in a crash.</strong> <q cite="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-recalls-legacy-outback-knee-guards.shtml">The 2017 Subaru Legacy and Outback vehicles are equipped with knee guard brackets that may not be properly attached to the steering beam assemblies.</q><!--more--></p>
<p>The knee guard is meant to help provide additional protection to a driver in a crash, especially if they aren't wearing a seat belt.</p>
<p>Or you could just wear your darn seat belt. #realtalk</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>New Outbacks Have Lots of Loose Bolts</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/outback-loose-bolts/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/outback-loose-bolts/</id>
      <published>2016-09-11T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2016-09-11T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Bolts on the 2017 Outback's front brake calipers, wheel hubs, and right stabilizer clamps, weren't properly tightened during assembly.</strong> You don't have to be a craftsman to know, stuff starts falling off real quick when bolts come undone. The <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-recalls-outback-loose-bolts.shtml" title="New Outbacks Have Lots of Loose Bolts">recalled</a> Outbacks were built between June 20, 2016, and June 23, 2016.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru Recalls 383,000 Vehicles with Takata Airbags</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-takata-recall/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-takata-recall/</id>
      <published>2016-05-28T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2016-05-28T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>This latest round of Takata recalls has been split into what the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is calling &quot;zones&quot; across the country.</strong> <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-recalls-7-models-takata-airbag-inflators.shtml">See the full list of recalled vehicles</a>.</p>
<p>Takata's metal inflators are at <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/resources/guides/takata/">risk of exploding</a> because they don't contain a drying agent called desiccate. Over time, the ammonium nitrate inside the inflator can become unstable when exposed to heat and humidity. If they do explode during an airbag deployment, metal shrapnel shoots throughout the cabin, injuring or killing the people inside.<!--more--></p>
<p>Subaru, like other automakers, doesn't have enough replacement parts to fix their vehicles. This is the largest recall in US history with 70 million cars affected and parts are scarce.</p>
<p>Owners should get an initial recall notice in the mail, and then another when parts become available.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Legacy and Outback Steering Wheels are Disengaging</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/recall-steering-wheel-disengages/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/recall-steering-wheel-disengages/</id>
      <published>2016-05-12T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2016-05-12T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru owners are being told to park their cars and not drive until they can get it fixed. Why?</strong> Because &quot;turning the steering wheel (of the 2016-2017 Subaru Legacy and Outback) may have <strong>no effect</strong> on the direction of the wheels&quot; Oh, that's a problem.<!--more--></p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;<em>(Subaru) says the tool used in building the steering column used an incorrect setting and caused an improper machining of one of the steering column shafts. The condition can cause the steering column shaft to fail to engage properly and leave the steering wheel to rotate freely any way it wants.</em>&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-recalls-legacy-outback-steering-wheel.shtml">recall</a> was expected to begin on May 13, 2016.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru Excessive Oil Consumption Lawsuit Settled, Here&#39;s the Details</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/settlement-oil-consumption/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/settlement-oil-consumption/</id>
      <published>2016-05-05T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2016-05-05T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Burning through a quart of oil every 2,500 miles is a drag. Blowing up your engine because you pushed it to 2,600 miles is an even <em>bigger</em> drag.</strong> So it's no wonder Subaru owners filed a <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2014/subaru-class-action-lawsuit-excessive-oil-consumption.shtml">lawsuit</a> in 2014 over worn out piston rings, excessive oil consumption, and the frowns associated with an $8000 repair bill.<!--more--></p>
<p>Well turn those frowns, upside down. Subaru has agreed to a <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-oil-consumption-class-action-lawsuit.shtml">settlement</a>, but won't admit any guilt in the process. Instead they're just doing it to &quot;save on the cost of litigation.&quot; OK, guys, whatever helps you sleep at night (<em>wink, wink</em>).</p>
<p>The final hearing is scheduled for July 26, 2016.</p>
<p>In the meantime, you should read more details about the settlement --- including which models are covered by year, transmission, and VIN --- <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-oil-consumption-class-action-lawsuit.shtml">on CarComplaints.com</a>.</p>
<p>Think of it like homework, but homework that could result in cash reimbursements. Man, I wish they had that back in high school.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Does the Outback Have a Visibility Problem?</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/lawsuit-headlight-visibility/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/lawsuit-headlight-visibility/</id>
      <published>2016-05-02T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2016-05-02T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru Outback owners are seeing red. Well, technically they're not seeing <em>anything</em> and that's the problem.</strong> <q cite="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-outback-headlight-problems-lawsuit.shtml">Subaru Outback owner Kathleen O’Neill filed a lawsuit after allegedly experiencing numerous failures of exterior lighting, especially the headlights. The lawsuit says O’Neill purchased a new 2011 Subaru Outback and by the end of 2011, the left front headlight had failed followed by the right headlight in February 2012.</q><!--more--></p>
<p>The lawsuit names the <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/Subaru/Outback/2010/lights/">2010</a> and <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/Subaru/Outback/2011/lights/">2011</a> model years, and our data confirms both have complaints about headlight issues.</p>
<p>If anything comes of the lawsuit, we'll let you know.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Air Intake and Engine Stalls Recall</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/recall-turbo-air-intake/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/recall-turbo-air-intake/</id>
      <published>2016-04-04T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2016-04-04T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Owners of a turbocharged WRX or Forester may want to put the brakes on for a while.</strong> <q cite="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-recalls-wrx-forester-20xt-engine-stall.shtml">The 2015-2016 Subaru WRX and Forester 2.0XT have turbocharger air intake ducts that may crack and cause problems with engine performance while driving.</q><!--more--></p>
<p>Symptoms of a cracked turbocharger air intake duct include rough idling, reduced power, and a bruised ego when trying to accelerate.</p>
<p>Subaru hasn't said when the <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-recalls-wrx-forester-20xt-engine-stall.shtml">recall</a> will begin.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Hood Latches Recalled in Tribeca Hoods</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/recall-tribeca-hood-latch/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/recall-tribeca-hood-latch/</id>
      <published>2016-02-11T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2016-02-11T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Let's face it --- there are a lot of dangerous things that can go wrong with your car.</strong> Having your hood fly open and slam into the windshield while driving? That definitely ranks up there.<!--more--></p>
<p>Subaru is <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2016/subaru-tribeca-hood-latch-problems-recall.shtml">recalling</a> 77,000 Tribecas for that exact reason:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;Subaru blames the problem on rusted parts or solidified grease that can gradually cause the springs inside the hood safety system or hood lock system to fail to return to the proper positions.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Blame it on whatever you want, Subaru. Just get it fixed. The automaker didn't say when the recall will begin.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>An Oil Consumption Settlement is on the Way</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/is-oil-consumption-settlement-on-the-way/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2016/is-oil-consumption-settlement-on-the-way/</id>
      <published>2016-01-12T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2016-01-12T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru has agreed to settle a lawsuit that says certain cars require a small fortune to keep the engine full of oil.</strong> The plaintiffs say there aren't enough dead dinosaurs and other fossil fuels to keep these engines fed.<!--more--></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2014/subaru-class-action-lawsuit-excessive-oil-consumption.shtml">original lawsuit</a> thought the problem was defective piston rings, but:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;Subaru issued four technical service bulletins to dealers about excessive oil consumption that told dealers to replace the piston rings for any customer who complained about oil consumption. Subaru owners complain the cost can be as much as $8,000 to replace the piston rings and it does nothing to decrease oil consumption.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Subaru has agreed to provide a free “oil consumption test” to affected owners, in addition to extending the warranty to 8 years/100,000 miles.</p>
<p>Settlement notices have been or will be mailed to owners who then must file for compensation.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Gas Leaks Blamed on Torque Wrench Usage in Factory</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/recall-gas-leaks/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/recall-gas-leaks/</id>
      <published>2015-12-13T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2015-12-13T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru is recalling 3,200 brand new vehicles for a problem that could eventually lead to a fire.</strong> <q cite="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-recalls-legacy-outback-gas-leaks.shtml">Subaru says proper tightening procedures weren't followed for the nuts that secure the propeller shaft to the rear differential. The automaker blames the problem on an improper use of the torque wrench.</q></p>
<p>Looks like somebody in the Subaru factory is going back to &quot;Torque Wrench 101.&quot; So how do some loose nuts lead to a fire? It's simple, really.<!--more--></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Loose connection → propeller shaft comes loose → propeller hits the gas tank → gas tank leaks → small spark turns your car into a lump of coal.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>OK, maybe it <em>isn't</em> that simple, but the threat is there. If you own a 2016 Legacy or Outback you should get your car fixed as soon as possible. The recall is already underway and there's <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-recalls-legacy-outback-gas-leaks.shtml">full details</a> on our site.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Tribeca Hoods Flying Open on then Road</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/lawsuit-tribeca-hood-latch/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/lawsuit-tribeca-hood-latch/</id>
      <published>2015-10-04T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2015-10-04T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>When the hood flies open to give the windshield a hug, it's easy to see why you wouldn't &quot;feel the love&quot; of a Subaru.</strong> Maybe that's why there's a <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2015/lawsuit-subaru-tribeca-hoods-fly-open.shtml">lawsuit</a> for defective hood latches in the 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca.<!--more--></p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;Plaintiff Marion Hadley claims she was driving her 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca 65 mph when the hood suddenly flew open. Hadley says the hood slammed into the windshield, sending glass all over her and dislodging the rear-view mirror.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Did Subaru know about this design flaw? They won't admit it, but they <em>did</em> change the hood design to use bolts instead of plastic clips starting in the 2007 model year.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Transmission Leaks and Fires Prompt Recall</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/recall-transmission-leaks-fires/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/recall-transmission-leaks-fires/</id>
      <published>2015-08-25T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2015-08-25T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru has recalled some 2015-2016 Legacys and Outbacks for a manufacturing error in the propeller shaft connected to the transmission.</strong> <q cite="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-recalls-legacy-outback-fire-risk.shtml">[Subaru] says the seal cap and seal may be deformed inside the propeller shaft yoke, a problem that can cause transmission fluid to leak.</q></p>
<p>That leaking transmission fluid can hit the hot exhaust pipe and start a fire. Car fires are no yoke.<!--more--></p>
<p>You should have received your notice by now as the recall was expected to begin on August 28, 2015. To find out which specific vehicles were recalled, <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-recalls-legacy-outback-fire-risk.shtml">visit our site</a> or call Subaru at 800-782-2783. They're using recall number WQU-56 for this problem (if you call, kindly inform them that W, Q, and U aren't numbers).</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Blinding Dashboard Glare Lawsuit</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/lawsuit-dashboard-glare/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/lawsuit-dashboard-glare/</id>
      <published>2015-08-12T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2015-08-12T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Being able to see the road clearly is one the cornerstones to a successful day of driving.</strong> That's probably why some Legacy and Outback owners are so fed up with their dashboards.</p>
<p>A proposed <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-melting-dashboard-lawsuit.shtml">class-action lawsuit</a> says the dashboards were made with a defective material that fails in high heat or sunlight. It melts, becomes shiny, and creates a strong glare off the windshield.<!--more--></p>
<p>Some say you can simulate the experience by duct taping a flood light to your dash, point it directly at your retinas, and then try to not rear-end the person in front of you. Bonus points if you do it with a massive headache because the the melting dashes tend to give off a mind-numbing chemical smell:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;The plaintiffs claim the cost to replace a melted dashboard can be as high as $1000. Once a customer has paid to have a new dashboard installed, the original defective plastic is still used and will eventually melt and become a blinding menace.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And then there's the question of its affect in airbags:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;The plaintiffs say the passenger-side airbag deploys through perforations in the dashboard, so what happens if the dashboard is damaged?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Subaru denies and wrongdoing because ... of course they do. The lawsuit targets the 2005-2009 model years.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Heads up down below! Multiple models recalled electrical issues in Australia</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/electrical-issues-down-under/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/electrical-issues-down-under/</id>
      <published>2015-08-10T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2015-08-10T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Over 50,000 Subaru Foresters, XV Crosstreks and Impreza vehicles are subject to a new recall program</strong> in Australia for a manufacturing defect in the steering column. It’s not known if these vehicles will be recalled in the U.S. or other global markets.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru&#39;s Parent Company Rolling in the Dough</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-is-rolling-in-dough/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-is-rolling-in-dough/</id>
      <published>2015-07-31T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2015-07-31T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p>Subaru sales continue to climb in the USA. And climb. And climb.** Japan's Fuji Heavy Industries --- the maker of Subaru vehicles --- saw a 70% increase in <acronym title="First Quarter of 2015">Q1</acronym> operating profits over the previous quarter.<!--more--></p>
<h2 id="consumer-demand">Consumer Demand <a class="heading-permalink" href="#consumer-demand">∞</a></h2>
<p>Demand in the US for the once <em>Birkentocked</em> cars is off the charts. In fact, Fuji Heavy Industries has struggled to meet it. Sales were up 28% (to $1.08 billion dollars), with a majority of the demand for the <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/Subaru/Legacy/" title="Subaru Legacy Problems">Legacy</a> and <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/Subaru/Outback/" title="Subaru Outback Problems">Outback</a>. Just take one drive down my street and you'd swear it was the <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/Subaru/Forester/" title="Subaru Forester Problems">Forester</a>.</p>
<p>Now the $1.08 billion dollar question is -- will increased demand and manufacturing pressure mean more problems coming off the line?</p>
<p>Rolling in the depp.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Outback Passes the &#39;Throw a Camaro On It&#39; Test</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/camaro-lands-on-outback/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/camaro-lands-on-outback/</id>
      <published>2015-07-28T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2015-07-28T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Police say a Chevy Camaro driver lost control of his vehicle (ya think?), went airborne and ended up on top of a 2014 Subaru Outback in a Tennessee parking lot.</strong> If I owned that Subaru my anger would only be outweighed by how impressed I am he stuck the landing.<!--more--></p>
<h2 id="a-dazzling-wreck">A Dazzling Wreck <a class="heading-permalink" href="#a-dazzling-wreck">∞</a></h2>
<p>Passersby probably thought this scene was staged. Maybe for a movie? But it really happened. The Subaru owner, who was stocking up on some fine adult beverages when he heard a horrible noise, came out to find his Outback wearing a brand new hat.</p>
<p>Red really does bring out its headlights, if that's any consolation.</p>
<p>&lt;img src=&quot;<a href="http://cdn.carcomplaints.com/minisites/img/subaru/camaro-crash-1.jpg">http://cdn.carcomplaints.com/minisites/img/subaru/camaro-crash-1.jpg</a>&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; lazyload=&quot;true /&gt;</p>
<p>As for the Camaro driver, he was able to jump out of his car and hop down to safety without being hurt. Although I'm guessing there's a speeding ticket or wreck-less driving citation coming his way soon.</p>
<p>&lt;img src=&quot;<a href="http://cdn.carcomplaints.com/minisites/img/subaru/camaro-crash-2.jpg">http://cdn.carcomplaints.com/minisites/img/subaru/camaro-crash-2.jpg</a>&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; lazyload=&quot;true /&gt;</p>
<p>Still, impressive kid. Damn impressive.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>An Update on the Excessive Oil Consumption Lawsuit</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/torque-news-oil-consumption-lawsuit/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/torque-news-oil-consumption-lawsuit/</id>
      <published>2015-07-25T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2015-07-25T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong><a href="http://torquenews.com/">TorqueNews.com</a> has an update on the Girard Gibbs Law Group <a href="http://www.torquenews.com/1084/update-subaru-oil-consumption-class-action-lawsuit">class-action suit</a> which accuses Subaru FB engines of burning through too much oil.</strong> The update includes a Q&amp;A that might be helpful to owners.<!--more--></p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru&#39;s Airbags Disabled by Cell Phones?</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/recall-impreza-airbags-disabled-by-phone/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/recall-impreza-airbags-disabled-by-phone/</id>
      <published>2015-07-15T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2015-07-15T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Did you hear about the strange recall Subaru issued for the 2012 Impreza?</strong> It involves airbags, metal and phone chargers. <q cite="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-recalls-impreza-airbag-failures.shtml">Subaru is recalling the cars after finding what can only be described as a strange cause for the airbag failures. The automaker says the airbag occupant detection system can fail if a front seat passenger uses a cell phone or other device that is plugged into the power outlet.</q><!--more--></p>
<p>Considering most of us have cell phones nowadays, this is a big deal.</p>
<p>The recall was announced back in July 2015, so you should have received a notice by now. This is a reminder for anyone who hasn't heard or received their repairs yet. <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-recalls-impreza-airbag-failures.shtml">Full details</a> are available on <a href="http://carcomplaints.com/">CarComplaints.com</a>, or you can call Subaru at 800-782-2783 and make reference to recall number WQT-55.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru EyeSight Fails to Automatically Detect Objects in the Road</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/recall-eyesight-caught-napping/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/recall-eyesight-caught-napping/</id>
      <published>2015-06-25T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2015-06-25T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru's EyeSight has been caught napping on the job.</strong> EyeSight is Subaru's advanced collision avoidance system that is always looking ahead and making sure the path is clear. Well, except when it's not. A defective switch that activates the brake lights can fail and that, in turn, tells the pre-collision system to &quot;take five.&quot;<!--more--></p>
<p>The problem was discovered on April 15, 2015 when Subaru was developing other models. Of course, this isn't <a href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/eyesight/">the first time we've heard of EyeSight problems</a>.</p>
<p>The automaker says the <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-recalls-pre-collision-systems.shtml">following vehicles with the EyeSight feature are being recalled</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/Subaru/Legacy/2015/">2015 Subaru Legacy</a> (built between March 10, 2014 and April 16, 2015)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/Subaru/Outback/2015/">2015 Subaru Outback</a> (built between February 24, 2014 and April 16, 2015)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/Subaru/Impreza/2015/">2015 Subaru Impreza</a> (built between September 9, 2014 and April 14, 2015)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/Subaru/XV_Crosstrek/2016/">2015 Subaru XV Crosstrek</a> (built between October 16, 2014 and April 15, 2015)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/Subaru/WRX/2016/">2016 Subaru WRX</a> (built on March 23, 2015)</li>
</ul>
<p>Subaru hasn't announced when the recall will begin.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Impreza&#39;s OCS Isn&#39;t Working</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/investigation-impreza-ocs/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/investigation-impreza-ocs/</id>
      <published>2015-04-13T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2015-04-13T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>An occupant classification system needs to be able to identify <em>any</em> passenger in the front seat --- yes, even the ones that put their feet on your dashboard.</strong> That identification is used to determine whether or not to deploy the airbag in a crash.<!--more--></p>
<p>When owners start questioning if that system is working correctly, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) usually takes notice. That's exactly <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-impreza-investigated-passenger-airbags-fail.shtml">what's happening with over 33,000 2012 Subaru Impreza sedans</a>.</p>
<p>NHTSA opened their investigation after receiving multiple reports of the airbag light switching on and off with a passenger in the seat the whole time. NHTSA says Subaru has known about the problem since 2012 when they sent a Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) to dealers discussing the issue.</p>
<p>If a defect exists or a recall is ordered, we'll let you know about it.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Subaru recalls 200k cars for more corrosion in the brakes</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/recall-rusted-brake-lines-again/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2015/recall-rusted-brake-lines-again/</id>
      <published>2015-01-08T00:00:00-05:00</published>
      <updated>2015-01-08T00:00:00-05:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Well that didn't work.</strong> By <em>that</em> I mean Subaru's <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-recalls-rusted-brake-lines.shtml">recall of 660,000 vehicles</a> for rusted brake lines that could cause a sudden loss of braking. <!--more--> Turns out the <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2013/subaru-recalls-outback-and-legacy-leaking-brake-fluid.shtml">fix didn't work for almost 200,000 vehicles</a> that will need to be recalled for a second time.<!--more--></p>
<p>The fight against corrosion is a tough one, especially for a company that is popular in the <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/resources/salt-belt/">rust belt</a>, but it never looks good when your fixes are nothing more than band-aids. Not even the good band-aids, but you know those generic store brand kinds that don't stick and kind of smell like old cheese? Anways...</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2015/subaru-recalls-rusted-brake-lines.shtml">CarComplaints.com</a> points out:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The recall should begin January 26, 2015, when dealers will apply an anti-corrosion wax to the four-way joint connector area of the brake line system. You'll need to have the work done even if you had your vehicle &quot;repaired&quot; before.</p>
</blockquote>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Outback Trailer Hitch Recall</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2014/recall-outback-trailer-hitch/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2014/recall-outback-trailer-hitch/</id>
      <published>2014-10-10T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2014-10-10T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru owners are known for their outdoor enthusiasm and can often be seen towing everything from wave-runners to snowmobiles.</strong> But next time you want to haul that <em>Ski-Doo</em> I'd recommend you <em>Ski-Don't</em>; at least until you <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2014/subaru-outback-recalled-trailer-hitch-nuts-bolts.shtml">get your trailer hitch fixed</a>. Subaru says some of its Outbacks have an accessory trailer hitch problem and have issued a recall -- here's a breakdown of what you need to know.<!--more--></p>
<p><strong>The problem:</strong> The Outback trailer hitch has eight bolts welded to the body of the vehicle. Subaru says an owner could damage the bolts when tightening the nuts because the trailer hitch wasn't mounted properly during manufacturing.</p>
<p><strong>The recalled models:</strong> Any <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/Subaru/Outback/2015/">2015 Outback</a> (with a trailer hitch) that was manufactured between January 22, 2014 and August 18, 2014. Only 56 vehicles in total.</p>
<p><strong>Next steps:</strong> Subaru should have already sent out their recall notices asking owners to schedule an appointment. The eight mounting nuts will need to be replaced and dealers will inspect the eight bolts for any damage too.</p>
<p>Questions or concerns? Give Subaru a ring at 800-782-2783 and refer to recall number WQN-50.</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
    <entry>
      <title>Rusted Brake Lines Recall</title>
      <link href="http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2014/recall-rusted-brake-lines/"/>
      <id>http://www.subarucomplaints.com/news/2014/recall-rusted-brake-lines/</id>
      <published>2014-07-04T00:00:00-04:00</published>
      <updated>2014-07-04T00:00:00-04:00</updated>
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[

      <p><strong>Subaru is recalling 660,000 cars with brake lines that can rust out due to road salt.</strong> The recall only affects Subarus sold in cold-weather states ... so <em>basically</em> all of them. This isn't Subaru's first <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2013/subaru-recalls-outback-and-legacy-leaking-brake-fluid.shtml">brake line rusting rodeo</a>, either. Full details can be <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2014/subaru-recalls-rusted-brake-lines.shtml">found on our site</a>, but here's a breakdown of what you need to know.<!--more--></p>
<p><strong>The &quot;road salt&quot; problem:</strong> It's no surprise that road salt is corrosive, its job, after-all, is to eat through surface ice. We use a lot of the stuff here in Vermont during the long winters. In fact, I'm pretty sure Vermonters are made up of at least 3% road salt (the other 97% is a combination of maple syrup and Ben &amp; Jerrys). And while the chemistry of road salt is pretty awesome, it's a lot less awesome when you realize it's not just eating away at ice -- it's also feasting on your door panels, undercarriage and brake lines.</p>
<p>Once brake lines corrode, brake fluid pours out and that whole &quot;being able to stop your car&quot; feature disappears.</p>
<p><strong>The vehicles affected:</strong> The <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2014/subaru-recalls-rusted-brake-lines.shtml">recall</a> covers 660,000 vehicles including the 2005-2009 Outback, 2005-2009 Legacy, 2008-2011 Impreza, 2008-2014 Impreza WRX/STI, and 2009-2013 Forester. It's important to note:</p>
<ul>
<li>Only cars originally or currently registered in &quot;salt belt states&quot; (see below) are affected.</li>
<li>Any car <a href="http://www.carcomplaints.com/news/2013/subaru-recalls-outback-and-legacy-leaking-brake-fluid.shtml">previously recalled</a> for similar issues will need to be repaired again.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The &quot;salt belt&quot; states:</strong> Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia</p>
<p><strong>What to Do Next:</strong> Subaru hasn't announced when the recall will begin, but when it does dealers will check the brake lines for any fluid leaks and apply rustproofing or anti-corrosion wax if necessary.</p>
<p>Concerned owners can contact Subaru at 800-782-2783 and refer to recall number WQK-47</p>

      
      ]]></content>
    </entry>
    
	
</feed>